[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: note and dynamics collisions in lilypond
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: note and dynamics collisions in lilypond |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:09:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8 |
Hi,
This kind of emails should go to the mailing lists (either -user or -devel).
CC:d to lilypond-user.
On Saturday 02 July 2005 21.51, Stephen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you heard whether there is a move to eliminate collisions between
> notes and dynamics?
dynamics work the same way as text. Have you read the manual section "Changing
defaults"?
> I think the code could be placed soly in the dynamics side. That is the
> dynamics avoid note, not the other way around. Perhaps that would follow
> the way engravers did it manually as the quote I found suggests.
>
> In the lilypond-user archive in a message from David Rogers in a thread
>
> called 'How to thengthen dynamis hairpin' (sic), he mentioned:
> > Some of the < and > signs do not follow these formats at all >- instead,
> > presumably intended as more "general" signs, they >cover whole bars or
> > several bars, and are obviously placed >without regard to note positions.
>
> .>
>
> >It also appears that they are one of the first things to be >modified,
> >often in asymmetrical ways, in case of collision or >near-collision with
> >anything else. Perhaps as if they were >placed last, being only straight
> >lines and relatively easy to >"fit in".
>
> This idea of moving the dynamics around the notes strikes me as the most
> workable, since you can then have a heirarchy of collision avoidance
> starting with the existing note collision aviodance without needing to
> modify that. I also think it would be the most attractive since the
> placement of notes really takes precedence over the placement of the
> dynamics both visually and functionally. And finaly it would probably
> reflect the way music engraving has been done historically.
Yes, moving the dynamics is probably how it should be fixed.
> But anyway, have you heard whether anyone is working on dynamic collision?
No, but the problem of text collision in general is on the far-future todo.
BTW, there's no explicit bug in our bug archive about dynamics colliding with
notes; can you send a short .ly example when this occurs?
--
Erik Sandberg
Maintainer of the Lilypond bug CVS archive,
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lilypond/lily-bugs/bugs/
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/bugs/out/index.html
- Re: note and dynamics collisions in lilypond,
Erik Sandberg <=