[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: comparing lilypond (was Re: More pictures to manual)
From: |
Fairchild |
Subject: |
RE: comparing lilypond (was Re: More pictures to manual) |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:32 -0500 |
Following the link Anders' provided finds a rich source of scores coded in
Humdrum/**kern. Anyone know if there exists S/W to convert Humdrum code to
Lilypond?
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 5:05 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: comparing lilypond (was Re: More pictures to manual)
It would be extremely useful for someone wanting to compare the work and
performance of Lilypond to other tools to look at typesetting of some
"real-life" examples, examples which have already been used for such
comparisons.
One such set of examples is at CCARH:
http://www.ccarh.org/publications/reprints/ieee/INDEX.HTM
If we could compare both the printed results and the coding involved with
other tools we already work with, it would be an indication of how a day of
real work would look in lilypond.
-anders
>>> "R" == Roman <Käppeler <address@hidden>> writes:
R>
R> Hi,
R> I don't know whos making the documentation for Lilypond, but my
R> suggestion is to put many, many, many ... more pictures to the
R> manual!
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user