Re: \oneVoice and \voiceXX commands having the wrong scope

[Graham Percival]

On 28-Jan-05, at 8:28 AM, Yuval Harel wrote:
> This example is a very useful. Until now I didn't understand why the 
> two different syntaxes
> << {} {} >> and << {} \\ {} >> were necessary.
> I think it should appear in the documentation (with the addition of 
> \voiceOne and \voiceTwo to avoid collisions and the "Too many clashing 
> notecolumns." warning), along with
> explanation that the << \\ >> approach produces separate voices, and 
> some examples showing
> how voice flow in and out of such constructs (perhaps using slurs).
> I'm willing to write this (and send it to the development list? to 
> Graham?)

Great!  Please send it to lilypond-devel.

I've updated the polyphony docs somewhat in 2.5.x; please have a look 
at them
and suggest changes / additions.

Cheers,
- Graham