[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Methods of working
From: |
Alex Young |
Subject: |
Re: Methods of working |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:48:33 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 June 2004 14:20, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> > I do like the CVS interface--I've been wondering how to version my work
> > efficiently.
>
> Version control is another thing I don't live without. I used to use
> CVS but now I'm switching to subversion. I tend to commit from time
> to time, and I try not to commit code that will "break" the
> score. Having a meaningful Changlog is also helpful. I also use
> tags to mark events like the first draft, the copy sent to first
> performance, etc.
That's subversion and CVS, but has anyone tried Arch? I'm tempted to give it
a go. Testimonials? Acrimonials?
See You Later,
- --
Alex Young
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA2zATAKlkW5qIxC0RAlb0AKCgMhfb47M80kzHosFot4fQvlgT1wCeIW1g
zrdRUZP+9yS8bB947djyu68=
=N/eR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Methods of working, Pedro Kroger, 2004/06/24
Re: Methods of working,
Alex Young <=
RE: Methods of working, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/06/24
Re: Methods of working, Julian Squires, 2004/06/24
Re: Methods of working, chip, 2004/06/27
Re: Methods of working, chip, 2004/06/27