[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Time |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:02:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
On Thursday 17 June 2004 04.09, Joshua Koo wrote:
> Wow, Amazing! Well I didnt expect you would really type up and time
> yourself. I was just waiting to get some approimate estimates.
Well, I just did it for fun.. I never actually benchmarked my typesetting, I
also wanted to see how much time it actually takes.
> I definally
> took much much much longer than you did, and means I would have to improve
> myself much more. Thanks for pointing out the possible mistakes. Bar 17:
> According to my score, it it correct.
Then it probably is correct; i just suspected it wasn't since it looked
inconsistent with the way it was done in some other places.
(but I'm not a cello player)
> So the dirty way was to use *2/3 when you didnt want triplets, and \times
> 2/3 when you needed the tripplets? Think I ask the question a while back
> here, but cant remember if it was answered. But anyway this is my method.
>
> \override TupletBracket #'number-visibility = ##f
Thanks.. I remembered it was something like this, so I grepped for "tuplet"
everywhere.. but apparently I didn't grep -i.
> \header {
> title = "Brandenberg Concerto No.5 (Keyboard Concencerto) Mvt 3"
> composer = "J.S. Bach"
> tagline = "address@hidden WIP for mutopia-project"
> meter = "Allegro"
btw, I think this should be piece.. meter is for metronome markings, I think.
I'm not sure though.
Erik
- Time, Joshua Koo, 2004/06/15
- Re: Time, Joshua Koo, 2004/06/15
- Re: Time, Joshua Koo, 2004/06/16
- Re: Time,
Erik Sandberg <=