|
From: | chip |
Subject: | Re: confused about transposing |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:34:58 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 |
Paul Scott wrote:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:Paul Scott writes:want to say: \transpose c bfWhat's wrong with \transpose bf cThat transposes up a whole step when to get from a B flat part to a C part one needs to transpose down a whole step.I don't get it. What do you use now then, if both of these do not work? Are you looking for `` \transpose c bf, ''?Actually yes. I answered above without checking what I thought was true.' \transpose bf c ' transposes down a minor seventh and ' transpose c bf, ' transposes down a whole step which is what is needed to get from tenor sax to trombone except I'm not whether that gets to the correct octave for trombone.Paul
It doesn't. I did \transpose c'' bfand I still need to verify with the bone player if any of the sections of the song need to be dropped an octave, a few high d and high e's. I don't know if those are reasonable for a bone player, or just out of range. Otherwise it worked fine.
-- Chip
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user .
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |