[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constructive criticism
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: constructive criticism |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:36:20 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> A first step to improve the usability of the "programmer reference"
> (which in my opinion is a misnomer)
It's called program reference; suggestions for better names
appreciated.
> would be to give more explicit
> explanations of the possible values for each property.
> One problem is that the set of possible values may be different for the
> same property depending on what kind of object you set it on, but in
> most cases that's not a problem.
We can solve that partly, by having different doc-strings per
interface, by adding
("generic string"
(text-item-interface . "specific doc string")
(rest-interface . "specific doc string")
)
but I think that a first improvement would be to simply add the
information to the interface doc-strings.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: constructive criticism, (continued)
- Re: constructive criticism, Paul Scott, 2004/01/07
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/07
- Re: constructive criticism, Nick Busigin, 2004/01/07
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/10
- Re: emacs editing, was constructive criticism, Paul Scott, 2004/01/10
- Re: constructive criticism, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/01/10
- Re: constructive criticism, Ferenc Wagner, 2004/01/07
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: constructive criticism, Ferenc Wagner, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Nick Busigin, 2004/01/08
- property syntax (was Re: constructive criticism), John Williams, 2004/01/09
- property syntax (was Re: constructive criticism), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/10
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/01/08
- Re: constructive criticism, Aaron, 2004/01/08