Re: Relative mode

[Rune Zedeler]

David Raleigh Arnold wrote:

> I guess I didn't understand your proposal then, or you changed it and I 
> missed it.  Sorry.  I'm happy to withdraw my characterization of it 
> having the disadvantages of both, etc..  To quote:
>
> "So »c d e d c« and »c d' e' d, c,« would mean the same thing."

I don't understand what you mean.
It is true that in "relativetwo" c d e d c and c d' e' d, c, mean the 
same thing (namely the same as c d e d c in the old relative mode).

> But that doesn't matter.  A \relativetwo statement or something could 
> select it and it could still be entered with the colon, because anchor 
> notes would make \relativetwo more usable as well.  As things are, I 
> find relative mode unusable.  Anchor notes might change that for some 
> scores.

I agree that anchors would be nice.

-Rune