Re: piano_reduction & grand_score

[Mats Bengtsson]

Quoting neuro <address@hidden>:

> Yes, It works :)  Thank Mats very much !-)
> But, I have 2 more questions.
> 
> (
> I have to put the part notes on the same grand_score.ly or
> pian_reduction.ly, with small modification of disabling the
> % \property Staff.transposing = #-number
> in the piano_reduction.ly when there is
> \transpose c' f  \hornpart
> , for the midi output seemed to be deviated with Staff.transposing property
> )

Do you really want MIDI versions of both the full score and the piano
reduction? In that case, you should probably move the Staff.transposing
setting to the code that's specific for the full score, since the 
\transpose command does the same job and you don't want to apply the
transposition twice.

> 
> My next questions are:
> 
> 1) If I separate the orchestral parts in various files like
> horn.ly , clarinet.ly , flute.ly , ...
> how do I call them in the grans_score.ly and piano_reductin.ly ?
> Do they go like the files I showed appended here ?

There's no right or wrong here. You can split the files any way 
you wish, the \include command will make LilyPond behave exactly 
as if the contents of the \include:d file was inserted where the 
\include statement appears. I haven't looked carefully at your
example but it seems reasonable and you can easily check yourself
if it works or not.

> 2) How to make a \break of the
> \property Staff.instrument = "Horn in F"
> that, instead of showing
> " Horn in F ",
> it shows
> " Horn
> in F "

Something like \markup{ \lines <<{Horn}{in F}>> } should work, 
but I haven't tested it.

> ( Is this to be written at grand_score.ly , instead of horn.ly ? )
I did it that way, since you probably don't want the instrument
names in the piano reduction, only in the full score, right?

   /Mats