[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: split-subbeam direction
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: split-subbeam direction |
Date: |
27 May 2003 15:31:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> We recently talked with Paul Roberts, a notation guru that explained
> to us that it should really be
>
> | | | |
> |----------------|--|--|
> |---|--|--| |---|--|--|
> | | | |
>
>
> (the 1st stem determines the "direction" of the beam)
Yesterday I stumbled accros Read, who says that adding the second beam
below the primary one is *in this case* is the more usual thing to do,
but that there is no definate rule.
> I'm planning on extending the beam code to allow both versions, but
> as you might imagine, it's not very high on the priority list.
Yes, we might want to search/gather more insight into this.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org