[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex'
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex' |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:12:22 -0400 |
On Aug 3, 2022, at 06:10, Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 3 août 2022 à 11:44, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Two weeks ago Dan asked the following:
>>
>>>> Can you force them to face each other?
>>>
>>> I think so, yes, with some TeX trickery.
>>
[… it is possible …]
>
> Sorry for jumping in as someone without any expertise in typography, but I
> can’t help thinking: why create the problem if it doesn’t already exist? :-)
If the index were split into two pages, I would prefer to see them together.
I don't say that having to flip pages would rise to the level of "problem", but
it would be an inferior experience.
If accommodating it would disrupt the rest of the NR, then I think it would be
better to make the visual index a separate document.
—
Dan
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Werner LEMBERG, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Jean Abou Samra, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex',
Dan Eble <=
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Jean Abou Samra, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Dan Eble, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Kieren MacMillan, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Aaron Hill, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Jean Abou Samra, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Werner LEMBERG, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Aaron Hill, 2022/08/03
- Re: integrating Joram's 'visualindex', Werner LEMBERG, 2022/08/03