[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2 |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 18:36:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.42.2 |
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.12.2021 um 18:14 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>
> On Thu, Dec 9 2021 at 08:24:27 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > LilyPond is built from source on Flathub infrastructure.
> > > If you click on the green check here:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/flathub/org.frescobaldi.Frescobaldi/commits/master
> > >
> > > you'll see the recent builds. This is for aarch64:
> > > https://flathub.org/builds/#/builders/51/builds/5253
> > >
> > > Yes, it's not Github.
> >
> > Ok, so it could stay like this, there's nothing that would be "broken"
> > by not providing AArch64 binaries.
>
> Yes, I can keep building the binaries from source using Flathub tools.
>
> LilyPond binaries would have allowed me to remove an heavy build dep
> (texlive Sdk), simplify the manifest and build Frescobaldi flatpak more
> quickly.
> Maybe one day someone will have an aarch64 device to build lilypond
> binaries.
Is it a requirement that you provide AArch64, or are there actually
users? (on which platform?)
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, Michael Käppler, 2021/12/05
Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, Federico Bruni, 2021/12/07
Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, Gabriel Striewe, 2021/12/08
Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2, Petr Pařízek, 2021/12/05