[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ready for 2.21.80?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: ready for 2.21.80? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:49:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.1 |
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 13:54 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:36 +0000 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> > On 01/11/2020 12:30, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 12:02 +0000 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> > > > Thanks. Now uploaded.
> > > Thanks to you for staying with us while we resolve such things!
> > >
> > > > We do need to get the latest/correct VERSION into master, as well as
> > > > updating the news details. That should allow the website to be
> > > > rebuilt. I'm assuming that the best bet would be to cherry-pick the
> > > > news updates from stable/2.22 into release/unstable, and edit and push
> > > > VERSION to unstable as well, then create a merge request?
> > > Yes, though I'd use a temporary branch because that doesn't have the
> > > restriction of release/unstable that cannot be force-pushed.
> > No worries. Be good if you could do this.
>
> Ok, will do.
Now online at lilypond.org; will you announce to lilypond-user to
invite wide-spread testing?
Jonas
> > >
> > > Which commits do we need exactly from the release process?
> > >
> > > 168c4fac7d Release: bump VERSION_DEVEL.
> > Think it might be easier just to update VERSION directly, since the current
> > patch level is wrong for the updated master.
>
> Yeah, that could give conflicts. I'll see what git does for me 😄
P.S.: git figured it out by itself 😉
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part