[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tie over clef change
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: tie over clef change |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:31:11 +0200 |
> On 26 Sep 2020, at 14:55, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Despite Gould's “incorrect” verdict, here is an example from an old UE
> edition of Liszt's “Liebestraum No. 1”, which demonstrates that ties
> over clef changes *do* happen and make sense sometimes...
>
> I still think that LilyPond should support that, handling the tie like
> a slur in this case.
A tie indicates that it is a note whose (time) value (normally) otherwise
cannot be expressed in the notational system, thus having the same pitch,
whereas a slur indicates an articulation of notes of different pitch, that they
should be played together. What do you think it is in your example? :-)
Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change, Andrew Bernard, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/26
Re: tie over clef change,
Hans Åberg <=
Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/27