[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tie over clef change
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: tie over clef change |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:41:05 -0400 |
On Sep 26, 2020, at 08:55, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> Despite Gould's “incorrect” verdict, here is an example from an old UE
> edition of Liszt's “Liebestraum No. 1”, which demonstrates that ties
> over clef changes *do* happen and make sense sometimes...
>
> I still think that LilyPond should support that, handling the tie like
> a slur in this case.
That's a very good example. It's hard to imagine any reasonable alternative.
What kind of grob would an editor expect here? a Tie because it connects notes
of the same pitch, or a Slur because it connects notes at different staff
positions? (or something else?)
—
Dan
- tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/26