[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tiny fixes for "Extract PDFmark" (issue 571420055 by address@hidden)
|
From: |
lemzwerg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Tiny fixes for "Extract PDFmark" (issue 571420055 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jan 2020 22:21:49 -0800 |
> > Do you want me to make this change?
> > I don't have a strong opinion on this one,
> > I just left the name from the original message.
>
> In case a second opinion is useful, I'll give mine.
> I see Werner's point, but I also think
> the current name is clear enough,
> so I wouldn't blame you for leaving it alone.
Given that packages for GNU/Linux distributions are rather called
`extractpdfmark` than `Extract PDFmark` you save people from doing one
more google search if you use the former. So yes, I favour a change of
the name.
https://codereview.appspot.com/571420055/