[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patchy email
From: |
Knut Petersen |
Subject: |
Re: Patchy email |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2019 01:03:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 29.07.19 17:55, David Kastrup wrote:
Well, it is rather obvious that you should not be seeing failure with
unchanged master (assuming that you have some reasonably current Python
on your system) and I should not be seeing failure with your patch
(assuming that it tests out on your system: the symptoms are just too
clear to seem dependent on Python version). So it's likely that some
preinstalled part (assuming both of us worked from clean trees) creeps
into both our operations. That would be more likely than not a
preexisting problem not caused by your patch but we would still better
fix it before it causes more headaches.
In the chapter "Regtest comparison" of our contributor's guide we can read:
Run |make|with current git master without any of your changes.
Before making changes to the code, establish a baseline for the comparison
by going to the ‘$LILYPOND_GIT/build/’ directory and running:
make test-baseline
Stracing shows that after 'make all' it is also necessary to execute 'make install' prior to 'make test-baseline' or 'make test-clean'. If 'make install' is omitted, the result depends both on files from the baseline version and on files that belong to the version of lilypond that was last installed
with the same prefix.
David, please rerun the test of my patch against origin/master on your system.
On my system the process succeeds now:
exec*git clean -dfx *in /home/knut/sources/lily ... succeeded after 2
seconds
exec *git checkout origin/master* in /home/knut/sources/lily ...
succeeded after 0 seconds
Building LILYPOND origin/master (34a114b835b042537f598620ce41912f51dd4fa4)
...
exec *./autogen.sh --noconfigure* in /home/knut/sources/lily ...
succeeded after 0 seconds
exec *mkdir -p build* in /home/knut/sources/lily ... succeeded after 0
seconds
exec *cd /home/knut/sources/lily/build* in /home/knut/sources/lily ...
succeeded after 0 seconds
exec *../configure --prefix=/home/knut/sources/lilybuilt
--with-urwotf-dir=/home/knut/sources/urw-core35-fonts* in
/home/knut/sources/lily/build ... succeeded after 7 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 all* in /home/knut/sources/lily/build ...
succeeded after 137 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 install* in /home/knut/sources/lily/build
... succeeded after 2 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 test-baseline* in
/home/knut/sources/lily/build ... succeeded after 175 seconds
exec .*/make-regtest-pngs.sh -j9 -o* in
/home/knut/sources/lily/scripts/auxiliar ... succeeded after 71 seconds
exec *g**it checkout FIX_MUSICXML2LY* in /home/knut/sources/lily ...
succeeded after 0 seconds
Building LILYPOND FIX_MUSICXML2LY (9aae63f0e0adf31eeffe6e0cb11c0e5a22c9eae5)
...
exec .*/autogen.sh --noconfigure* in /home/knut/sources/lily ...
succeeded after 0 seconds
exec *mkdir -p build *in /home/knut/sources/lily ... succeeded after 0
seconds
exec *cd /home/knut/sources/lily/build* in /home/knut/sources/lily ...
succeeded after 0 seconds
exec *../configure --prefix=/home/knut/sources/lilybuilt
--with-urwotf-dir=/home/knut/sources/urw-core35-fonts* in
/home/knut/sources/lily/build ... succeeded after 7 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 all* in /home/knut/sources/lily/build ...
succeeded after 8 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 instal**l* in /home/knut/sources/lily/build
... succeeded after 5 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 test-clean* in
/home/knut/sources/lily/build ... succeeded after 0 seconds
exec *make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 check* in /home/knut/sources/lily/build ...
succeeded after 188 seconds
exec *./make-regtest-pngs.sh -j9 -n* in
/home/knut/sources/lily/scripts/auxiliar ... succeeded after 606 seconds
Total regression test time: 1208 seconds
If the process also succeeds on your system we would know that patchy needs a
fix.
Knut
- Re: Patchy email, (continued)
- Re: Patchy email, Knut Petersen, 2019/07/26
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/27
- Re: Patchy email, Knut Petersen, 2019/07/27
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/27
- Re: Patchy email, Knut Petersen, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email, Knut Petersen, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email,
Knut Petersen <=
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/29
- Re: Patchy email, Knut Petersen, 2019/07/30
- Re: Patchy email, Knut Petersen, 2019/07/30
- Re: Patchy email, James, 2019/07/27
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/27
- Re: Patchy email, James, 2019/07/27
- Re: Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2019/07/27
Patchy email, patchy, 2019/07/26