lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patchy email


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Patchy email
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:04:42 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden writes:
>
>> 14:39:40 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at    
>> 1c51a616e289fffb918942c8f1e189ab50809157
>> 14:39:51 Merged staging, now at:     1c51a616e289fffb918942c8f1e189ab50809157
>> 14:39:52     Success:                ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
>> 14:40:08     Success:                /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/configure 
>> --enable-checking
>> 14:40:11     Success:                nice make clean
>> 14:44:20     Success:                nice make -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
>> 14:47:28 *** FAILED BUILD ***
>>      nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
>>      Previous good commit:   7583351fbf2f08a4d1f3f0b075fe8b691adc0b95
>>      Current broken commit:  1c51a616e289fffb918942c8f1e189ab50809157
>> 14:47:28 *** FAILED STEP ***
>>      merge from staging
>>      Failed runner: nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
>> See the log file log-staging-nice-make-test--j9-CPU_COUNT=9.txt
>> 14:47:28 Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File 
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
>> line 528, in handle_staging
>>     self.build (issue_id=issue_id)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
>> line 328, in build
>>     issue_id)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
>> line 266, in runner
>>     raise FailedCommand ("Failed runner: %s\nSee the log file %s" % 
>> (command, this_logfilename))
>> FailedCommand: Failed runner: nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
>> See the log file log-staging-nice-make-test--j9-CPU_COUNT=9.txt
>
> Error log contains the message:
>
> if test -d /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/.git  ; then \
>         cd /tmp/lilypond-autobuild ; \
>         BR=`LANG=c git branch | grep "^\*" | sed -e "s|^* *||"` ; \
>         HD=`git rev-parse --verify HEAD` ; \
>         FP=`git merge-base --octopus master HEAD` ; \
>         echo "    BRANCH: $BR" ; \
>         echo "      HEAD: $HD" ; \
>         if [ ! -z $FP ]; then  \
>                 echo "MERGE_BASE: $FP" ; \
>                 echo -e '\n   HISTORY:\n   ========\n' ; \
>                 git log --pretty=format:"      HASH: %H%n   SUBJECT: %s%n" 
> $FP~1..HEAD ; \
>         else \
>                 echo "MERGE_BASE: unknown" ; \
>                 echo -e '\n   HISTORY:\n   ========\n' ; \
>                 git log --max-count=10 --pretty=format:"      HASH: 
> %H%nSUBJECT: %s%n" ; \
>         fi ; \
>         echo "" ; \
> fi > ./out-test/tree.gittxt
> fatal: Not a valid object name master
>
> Apparently, the patch from
> commit 7583351fbf2f08a4d1f3f0b075fe8b691adc0b95
> Author: Knut Petersen <address@hidden>
> Date:   Sun Jul 7 13:16:05 2019 +0200
>
>     Optimize tree.gittxt messages
>     
>     We display BRANCH, HEAD, MERGE-POINT
>     and HISTORY fom merge-point to HEAD.
>     
>     If we do not find a merge-point we
>     display the last ten commits if this
>     is possible.
>
> relies on the existence of a local (rather than upstream) branch
> "master", not a good idea.  I am backing out this commit from staging:
> it needs to get fixed.

Someone or some patchy happening to have a local master branch (a bad
idea since absolutely no development should happen in a local master
branch in our setup) already pushed that commit to staging.
Consequentially, I had to push a revert to staging and hope I'll get it
through without manually tampering with master.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]