lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUB with local git-repo?


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: GUB with local git-repo?
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:43:53 +0200

Am Di., 11. Juni 2019 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Am Di., 11. Juni 2019 um 18:35 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
> > <address@hidden>:
> >>
> >> Am Di., 11. Juni 2019 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
> >> <address@hidden>:
> >>
> >> > Just for fun I then tried to go for
> >> > https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond
> >> > a repository once set up by Janek.
> >> > ~/gub (master)$ make
> >> > LILYPOND_REPO_URL=https://github.com/lilypond/lilypond.git lilypond
> >> > =>
> >> [...]
> >> > make: *** [lilypond] Error 2
> >>
> >> Probably I should have done:
> >> LILYPOND_REPO_URL=git://github.com/lilypond/lilypond.git
> >> Note the git:// instead of https://
> >> At least it errors not immediately. I'll report later.
> >
> > Build failed because of
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5526/
> > which is fixed in master of our official repo.
>
> Unlikely.  A missing \version statement in a file that isn't even
> present in the branch cannot do much harm.  Or are we not talking about
> the stable/2.20 branch?
>
> --
> David Kastrup

I tried to build from _master_, so the file swing.ly is present, fixed
in the official repo, not fixed in Janek's repo.

Anyway, I'll think building from a local repo will not work (at least
someone can come up with a fix for the problem mentioned in my other
mail).
I regard it not unlikely the build from Janek's repo would have
succeeded, _if_ said fix would have been present.
Thus, I'll go for an own repo as soon as I can spare some time.
Probably next weekend ...

Cheers,
  Harm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]