[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NR: Add many function index entries. (issue 564590043 by address@hidden)
|
From: |
v . villenave |
|
Subject: |
NR: Add many function index entries. (issue 564590043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:17:19 -0700 |
Hi Werner, that’s a very nice patch done in a quite methodical way. I
just have a question:
https://codereview.appspot.com/564590043/diff/546570043/Documentation/notation/staff.itely
File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/564590043/diff/546570043/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#oldcode1487
Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1487:
I’m not familiar with the state of instrumentCues; why did this sentence
need to be removed? (Just out of curiosity; I’m not implying it didn’t.)
https://codereview.appspot.com/564590043/
- NR: Add many function index entries. (issue 564590043 by address@hidden),
v . villenave <=