[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729 |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:20:16 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:13:52AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> how about considering an LSR upgrade now?
I distinctly remember asking you to do this in January,
> Like, before the whole 2.13 bloody mess starts...
Too late for that. I suppose that we *could* backport everything
to stable/2.12, but I can't see this being worth it.
> - How involved would it be?
> - Do we have to download the lsr archive, update the whole thing by
> ourselves and send the new tarball to Seba?
Dunno. Ask him?
> - How do we update snippets that do not have a \version string? Do we
> concatenate one automatically, and then remove it?
Umm, convert-ly --from=2.10.12 ? Dunno if that adds one
automatically, but it's easy enough to remove
\version "2.12.2"
from all files in a directory.
> - Do you want me to give Seba a ping?
That sounds like a good idea.
Cheers,
- Graham
Note to self: I should really eat breakfast before pouncing on people
- Re: patch for bug 729, (continued)
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, Graham Percival, 2009/02/27
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/02/27
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, John Mandereau, 2009/02/28
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, Neil Puttock, 2009/02/28
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, Valentin Villenave, 2009/02/28
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/02/28
- Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/02/27