|
From: | Paul Scott |
Subject: | Re: Why not to implement everything in scheme? |
Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:29:04 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) |
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
The general idea would be that C++ is compiled and scheme is interpreted. The heavy calculations should often be more efficient in a compiled language. The mixture of scheme and C++ makes an ideal combination.Why not to implement everything in scheme and get rid of gcc -compiling of the source? Or, is it the lexical parser which forces the use of gcc?
Paul Scott
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |