|
From: | Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto |
Subject: | [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #5690 Tiny fixes for extractpdfmark |
Date: | Fri, 31 Jan 2020 20:55:25 -0000 |
The correct commits:
commit 308eb34190c8c4423eab4911bbe4f91a8fd02b43 Author: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> AuthorDate: Sat Jan 25 09:44:20 2020 +0100 Commit: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> CommitDate: Fri Jan 31 21:53:10 2020 +0100 Issue 5690/3: Update message for optional extractpdfmark From my experiments, enabling extractpdfmark rather increases the required disk space. This is probably because the process produces additional intermediate files. It only benefits the final PDF docs. commit ae0ad3aede7426a9d6885724bea2eecdb9a22072 Author: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> AuthorDate: Sat Jan 25 09:43:50 2020 +0100 Commit: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> CommitDate: Fri Jan 31 21:53:07 2020 +0100 Issue 5690/2: Fix extractpdfmark with GhostScript 9.50 GhostScript 9.50 defaults to -dSAFE, so the build system needs to pass in -dNOSAFE explicitly. commit 8d04fe2790b357e7fa4107d168b9173876966be4 Author: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> AuthorDate: Sat Jan 25 09:43:44 2020 +0100 Commit: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> CommitDate: Fri Jan 31 21:52:54 2020 +0100 Issue 5690/1: Fix extractpdfmark not coming from PATH If STEPMAKE_PROGS cannot find an optional program, it returns "false". Checking for this value is better than requiring exactly "extractpdfmark" which does not hold if the program is not in PATH and the user explicitly sets the environment variable EXTRACTPDFMARK.
[issues:#5690] Tiny fixes for extractpdfmark
Status: Fixed
Labels: Fixed_2_21_0
Created: Sat Jan 25, 2020 08:46 AM UTC by Jonas Hahnfeld
Last Updated: Fri Jan 31, 2020 08:51 PM UTC
Owner: Jonas Hahnfeld
Tiny fixes for extractpdfmark
Individual changes:
1) Fix extractpdfmark not coming from PATH
If STEPMAKE_PROGS cannot find an optional program, it returns "false".
Checking for this value is better than requiring exactly "extractpdfmark"
which does not hold if the program is not in PATH and the user explicitly
sets the environment variable EXTRACTPDFMARK.
2) Fix extractpdfmark with GhostScript 9.50
GhostScript 9.50 defaults to -dSAFE, so the build system needs to pas
in -dNOSAFE explicitly.
3) Update message for optional extractpdfmark
From my experiments, enabling extractpdfmark rather increases the
required disk space. This is probably because the process produces
additional intermediate files. It only benefits the final PDF docs.
http://codereview.appspot.com/571420055
Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list address@hidden https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |