lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 2474 di


From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 2474 discussion
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:30:29 -0000

The considerations on beam subdivision in [#5547] are probably pertinent.


[issues:#2474] tuplet beaming may be confusing

Status: Accepted
Created: Tue Apr 10, 2012 01:55 PM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Fri Jul 13, 2012 09:30 AM UTC
Owner: nobody

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: benko....@gmail.com
Originally owned by: benko....@gmail.com

opening a new issue from the discussion in
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2470

would be great if someone could quote standards about how to beam tuplets, or, more specifically, whether there are cases when beaming can (should) be different from tuplet spanners.

beaming together tuplets of eighthnotes may be particularly confusing if the tuplets involve quarters (which can't be beamed).

a simple (but perhaps too drastic) way would be to set all beamExceptions in time-signature-settings.scm to have ((1 . 12) . (3 3 ...)) as smallest setting, but this will certainly change behaviour of sixteenth patterns in, say, 2/2, 3/2 or 9/4 times.


Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]