|
From: | Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto |
Subject: | [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 2474 discussion |
Date: | Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:30:29 -0000 |
The considerations on beam subdivision in [#5547] are probably pertinent.
[issues:#2474] tuplet beaming may be confusing
Status: Accepted
Created: Tue Apr 10, 2012 01:55 PM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Fri Jul 13, 2012 09:30 AM UTC
Owner: nobody
Originally created by: *anonymous
Originally created by: benko....@gmail.com
Originally owned by: benko....@gmail.com
opening a new issue from the discussion in
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2470
would be great if someone could quote standards about how to beam tuplets, or, more specifically, whether there are cases when beaming can (should) be different from tuplet spanners.
beaming together tuplets of eighthnotes may be particularly confusing if the tuplets involve quarters (which can't be beamed).
a simple (but perhaps too drastic) way would be to set all beamExceptions in time-signature-settings.scm to have ((1 . 12) . (3 3 ...)) as smallest setting, but this will certainly change behaviour of sixteenth patterns in, say, 2/2, 3/2 or 9/4 times.
Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list address@hidden https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |