lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Re: #5201 Use


From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Re: #5201 Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:00:41 +0000

"this patch", as I understand it being the Rietveld issue in its final state, removed --bigpdf completely. At least that's what patch set 2 and patch set 3 claim in their message. It has a scope that was quite exceeding the scope that was agreed on to be sensible for 2.20 on the developer lists. This here is issue 5201, and the commit message for this issue states:
commit 398c2e17d45bf4d18723e14d52531e4e7d006dea
Author: Knut Petersen address@hidden
Date: Tue Oct 3 15:05:56 2017 +0100

Adapt lilypond to ghostscript 9.22, change command line options

Issue 5201

We need to adapt lilypond
to ghostscript 9.22 as our
old --bigpdf parameter is
broken by the new version
of gs.

--bigpdf is totally removed.

--pspdfopt=(size/TeX/TeX-GS)
is implemented to allow the
user to select the appropiate
set of -d... parameters for
different purposes.

The patch also contains some
minor fixes of related bugs,
introduces --eps to the
command line interface and
changes the bug-report
message, as post.gmane is
gone.

listing several changes that you say should not be a part of 2.20.

So I don't really see what you mean here. What is your actual proposal/vision for 2.20?


[issues:#5201] Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts

Status: Fixed
Labels: Fixed_2_21_0
Created: Sat Sep 23, 2017 03:53 PM UTC by Knut Petersen
Last Updated: Sat Oct 07, 2017 05:40 PM UTC
Owner: Knut Petersen

Use -b together with -dgs-never-embed-fonts

Signed-off-by: Knut Petersen address@hidden

http://codereview.appspot.com/325630043

There was an intense discussion about dramatically increased pdf file sizes caused by a patch in ghostscript.

To make it short: I think this patch fixes the problem. Please test.

You will see no effect without a working extractpdfmark package.

one example: notation.pdf is back to 6.875.674 bytes.


Sent from sourceforge.net because address@hidden is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]