Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 790 in lilypond: Position of horizontal beams in grace notes shouldn't be quantized so strictly

[lilypond]

Updates:
	Summary: Position of horizontal beams in grace notes shouldn't be  
quantized so strictly
        Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Low -Engraving-nitpick Type-Ugly

Comment #5 on issue 790 by address@hidden: Position of horizontal  
beams in grace notes shouldn't be quantized so strictly
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=790

2.19.23 behaviour is just fine for the first case given above, at any staff  
size.

For the second case from comment #1, the beam position gradation is still  
not as consistent with grace notes as with ordinary notes, but the  
difference is small, and it's much better than it used to be.

I used the following code:

\version "2.19.23"
#(set-global-staff-size 40)
\relative {
  \time 9/16
  \grace { f''16[ f] } s
  \grace { e[ e] } s
  \grace { d[ d] } s
  \grace { c[ c] } s
  \grace { b[ b] } s
  \grace { a[ a] } s
  \grace { g[ g] } s
  \grace { f[ f] } s
  \grace { e[ e] } s
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%

and

\version "2.19.23"
#(set-global-staff-size 11)
\relative {
  \time 9/8
  \stemUp
  f''16[ f]
  e[ e]
  d[ d]
  c[ c]
  b[ b]
  a[ a]
  g[ g]
  f[ f]
  e[ e]
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%

The issue is now similar to issue 3284 for articulations, I think.

Attachments:
        790-grace-sz-11.preview.png  2.1 KB
        790-grace-sz-20.preview.png  3.5 KB
        790-grace-sz-40.preview.png  5.9 KB
        790-ordin-sz-11.preview.png  2.4 KB
        790-ordin-sz-20.preview.png  3.8 KB
        790-ordin-sz-40.preview.png  6.5 KB

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings