[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3229 in lilypond: Use \relative without explic
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3229 in lilypond: Use \relative without explicit starting pitch in the docs |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:11:15 +0000 |
Updates:
Summary: Use \relative without explicit starting pitch in the docs
Labels: -Type-Enhancement Type-Documentation
Comment #30 on issue 3229 by address@hidden: Use \relative without explicit
starting pitch in the docs
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3229
Changed the summary title and issue type to reflect the remaining focus of
the issue. It would likely be comparatively easy to resuscitate the last
version of python/convert-rules.py in this patch and combine it with the
somewhat better language detection I seem to remember having placed in
released python/convertrules.py versions doing only the \relative ->
\relative c' part of getting old sources with different default argument
convention up to scratch.
The Frescobaldi adoption of this change is of course independent from
making the lion's share of LilyPond's docs and examples omit an explicit
reference pitch.
The script makes a massive amount of changes, and it would be good to at
least glance over the resulting diffs.
When this was first proposed, the consensus was more or less to take a
break and see whether people would tend to adopt this in the field.
If I do
git grep -l '\\relative {'|wc -l
in the current Mutopia repository, I see 53 files with this convention.
Except that if I grep in that file list for '\\version' it turns out that
there is a single version older than 2.16. It does not get more convincing
considering that it's a file submitted by a certain David Kastrup.
Now Mutopia is not necessarily representative, but if I grep for _other_
files containing a version of 2.18 or more, I get 663 files. So the
majority of submissions are with explicit starting pitch.
The submission guidelines on the Mutopia page do not appear to suggest any
particular use of \relative, so we can't blame them either.
For Frescobaldi, however, I consider this a reasonable _default_ conversion
to \relative since it avoids asking questions. And if it _does_ ask
questions, just typing return in response should likely crank out \relative
{ ... behavior.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3229 in lilypond: Use \relative without explicit starting pitch in the docs,
lilypond <=