|
| From: | lilypond |
| Subject: | Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4010 in lilypond: Chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:04:42 +0000 |
Comment #2 on issue 4010 by address@hidden: Chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4010 On 13/07/14 19:21, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi David,
At some point of time, one just has to accept that q is a shorthand. Once it becomes hard figuring out the proper semantics, we are leaving the shorthand realm.
Point taken...
But to imply that coming up with a logically consistent interpretation of each possibility is disingenuous. Here's one obvious option:
q repeats the previous chord, with cautionary or forced accidentals
not reindicated
q! repeats the previous chord, reindicating any forced accidentals
q? repeats the previous chord, reindicating any cautionary
accidentals
q!? repeats the previous chord, reindicating any forced accidentals
or cautionary accidentals.
So, in your specific examples:
<a! cis d?> q! is going to be what?
The same output as
<a! cis d?> <a! cis d>
<a cis d> q? is going to be what?
The same output as
<a cis d> <a cis d>
Cheers, Kieren.
--You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |