Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3330 in lilypond: bracketify-stencil moves grob's refpoint

[lilypond]

Comment #49 on issue 3330 by address@hidden: bracketify-stencil  
moves grob's refpoint
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3330

ok, ok.  I don't want bureaucracy, I'm just trying to get a grip on this  
issue.  With the limited time i have and increasing volume of the  
discussion (that's not a complaint; it's good that the discussion is  
detailed!) i'm loosing the understanding of what we want to achieve.

Let's approach this differently: maybe you could use that wiki to write  
down *your own* specification, as it is progressing?  (i.e. without having  
to disuss it, and without any "acceptation process".)  If not in wiki,  
maybe you could include such specs in the patches themselves, as an  
addition to CG/some other manual?

The point is: i'd really love to be able to go to one place and read a  
description of what (not how) the stencil code is supposed to do, and why.   
For example, "add-to-stencil and derived functions should be associative"  
is an extremely helpful big-picture design information, and helps  
tremendously when reviewing code.

Of course, i don't demand that you do this.  But without such info gathered  
in one place i'll probably be unable to participate int the discussion,  
unfortunately :(

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings