Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3330 in lilypond: bracketify-stencil moves grob's refpoint

[lilypond]

Comment #47 on issue 3330 by address@hidden: bracketify-stencil  
moves grob's refpoint
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3330

I think it would be very helpful if we had a specification (as in "a set of  
requirements that should be satisfied by the implementation, a description  
of what the system should do").  Once we agree upon the spec, it will be  
easier to discuss implementation (i'm already getting lost in the current  
discussion).

What would be the best way to write such a spec?  Adding next iterations as  
tracker comments doesn't seem to be optimal.
I've created a wiki page on Github (anyone with github account can edit it):
https://github.com/janek-warchol/lilypond-git/wiki/stencil-combining-spec
maybe this would work well.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings