lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 1698 in lilypond: Slurs and ties are not corre


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 1698 in lilypond: Slurs and ties are not correct over repeats
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:42:58 +0000


Comment #40 on issue 1698 by address@hidden: Slurs and ties are not correct over repeats
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1698

Regarding comment #38: please don't misrepresent me. It is not even possible to implement what you claim I have proposed. The actual proposal is sketched in <URL:https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049#msg17>.

If we make \broken a music function with a single postevent as argument, the proposed syntax would be
\broken( a b c) d
and, for an ending spanner, something like
a b( c d \broken)

That's the user interface. It does not reflect on the representation as music function.

Ties in the input don't really have more than one spanner direction, so one needs to decide what \broken~ is supposed to mean. Since we already have \repeatTie, it might imply an ending spanner. Not sure about the best course for ties, but for symmetric spanners, \broken is a rather straightforward user interface.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]