[Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function

lilypond-auto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function

From:	lilypond
Subject:	[Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:57:10 +0000

Status: Started
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch-new

New issue 2984 by address@hidden: Patch: Use define-void-function rather thandefine-music-function in several places

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2984

Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places

http://codereview.appspot.com/6854104

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places, lilypond <=
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places, lilypond, 2012/11/27
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places, lilypond, 2012/11/27

Prev by Date: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2963 in lilypond: doc: chord notes and fret diagram indications don't match
Next by Date: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places
Previous by thread: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2983 in lilypond: assertion failed with \glissando
Next by thread: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2984 in lilypond: Patch: Use define-void-function rather than define-music-function in several places
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread