Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2859 in lilypond: Patch: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs

[lilypond]

Updates:
	Summary: Patch: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void  
glyphs

Comment #10 on issue 2859 by address@hidden: Patch: Provide \hide and \omit  
functions for transparent and void glyphs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2859

To conclude the bikeshedding, an additional \un function has been provided  
in issue 2874 and \no has been renamed to \omit again, since \un\omit is  
less ugly than \un\no.

Since this is holding up issue 2870, I would propose (after Patchy passes,  
of course) to change this back to Patch-countdown.  It's not like it has  
not seen extensive review.