[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool versioning
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: libtool versioning |
Date: |
Mon, 3 May 2010 11:09:10 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Matěj Týč wrote:
....
If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
More specifically, it provides libtool with the information needed to
produce a suitably numbered library to satisfy a purpose. As you say,
libtool does not provide control over which versions of libraries are
consumed in a link since only the current version in the linker search
path, or the version indicated by a .la file, gets used.
I don't think that this makes libtool useless by any means.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: libtool versioning, (continued)
- Re: libtool versioning, Jef Driesen, 2010/05/03
- Re: libtool versioning, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/03
- Re: libtool versioning, Peter Rosin, 2010/05/04
- Re: libtool versioning, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/04
- Re: libtool versioning, Peter Rosin, 2010/05/04
- Re: libtool versioning, Jason Curl, 2010/05/06
- Re: libtool versioning, Peter Rosin, 2010/05/06
- Re: libtool versioning, Michel Briand, 2010/05/03
- Re: libtool versioning, Tor Lillqvist, 2010/05/04
Re: libtool versioning, Matěj Týč, 2010/05/03
Re: libtool versioning, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/03
Re: libtool versioning, Jason Curl, 2010/05/06