[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: different object sets in shared and static libs
From: |
John Calcote |
Subject: |
Re: different object sets in shared and static libs |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:34:40 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Brian,
Brian Dessent wrote:
> John Calcote wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to specify additional objects (sources) for the shared
>> library that will not be linked into the static library.
>
> You could always wrap the entire contents of the file with "#ifdef
> PIC". The objects would still be in the static lib but they would be
> essentially empty files. I know, not the cleanest solution.
>
> Brian
>
Hmmmm...
:)
John
Actually, thanks for the response. That's not bad if it's the only thing
possible. I always hate to hear that something can be done on Windows
and not on Linux. But I also understand that it's the high level of
abstraction in Automake that is causing the problem, not the inability
to actually use different objects in different libraries.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIUFMAdcgqmRY/OH8RAn0IAJ9PzPrnjxfkpPfdOgAZJRnUDtlVuQCdEXcT
rgZbIIDNsW6mS2qe02LbhVQ=
=HBtb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----