[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed
From: |
Duft Markus |
Subject: |
RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:31:26 +0100 |
Duft Markus <> wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I forgot about the need to 'make install' first.
>>
>> Does ls have an option to show full time stamp resolution? If yes,
>> please repeat the above after 'rm -rf t', using the option with both
>> ls invocations.
>
> Ok, i added --full-time. In the meantime i found something in
> sub/ltdl/Makefile. The rule for distdir is:
>
> 704 distdir: $(DISTFILES)
> 705 $(am__remove_distdir)
> 706 mkdir $(distdir)
>
> The mkdir fails because the directory allready exists... I'll dig
> deeper there.
>
Seems i found it: the distdir rule in the top level makefile looks a
little different:
472 distdir: $(DISTFILES)
473 $(am__remove_distdir)
474 test -d $(distdir) || mkdir $(distdir)
Shouldn't the one in sub/ltdl look the same? When adding the test -d
there, make dist runs through without error.
Cheers, Markus
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ralf
- Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed,
Duft Markus <=
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11