[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Favoring static linking at configure time
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Favoring static linking at configure time |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:55:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello,
* Brian Dessent wrote on Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 07:20:40PM CET:
> Benoit Sigoure wrote:
>
> > > Of course there is: -Wl,-Bstatic -lfoo -Wl,-Bdynamic
> >
> > Hmm I didn't know this. How portable is it? I guess a gccism, but
> > is it even portable across versions/ports of GCC?
[...]
> -B seems to be fairly portable; all of the following support it:
I implemented support for it in Libtool a while ago:
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/6727/focus=6730>
it was postponed due to "2.2 being out real soon now", and it being
possibly destabilizing to HEAD.
Maybe some data points to the end that it's rather stable (I think I
tested it pretty well at some point) would help.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Favoring static linking at configure time, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/12/04
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Brian Dessent, 2007/12/04
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/12/16
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Peter Rosin, 2007/12/16
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/12/16
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Peter Rosin, 2007/12/17
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/12/19
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Peter O'Gorman, 2007/12/04
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/12/04
- Re: Favoring static linking at configure time, Peter O'Gorman, 2007/12/04