[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:03:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:20:43AM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?,...:
>
> I more or less stumbled on this by accident, and was just trying to
> understand why libtool was removing the shared library that was specified
> by path. I assumed that the AM_GNU_GETTEXT was doing that for a reason.
I think it's doing it because of the macros in lib-link.m4 (from the
gettext distribution).
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/06
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/10/09
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Albert Chin, 2005/10/10
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/10
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/12
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Albert Chin, 2005/10/12
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/12
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/10/13