libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in libtoolize


From: Brian Barrett
Subject: Re: Bug in libtoolize
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:38:20 -0500

On Feb 16, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:

| Some suggestions for a fix:
|
| 1. Do the copy as now, but then have a series of "touch" statements to | modify the mtime/ctime all the relevant AM-specific files in the Right
| Order so that the timestamps will be proper.
|
| 2. Copy the files over in order in the first place (i.e., don't use a
| glob).
|
| 3. Tar up the source directory and untar it in the destination.
|
| Each of the three has benefits and drawbacks -- I guess I'd lean towards | #1. It's probably the least elegant, but it guarantees to get it Right
| with the least amount of work.

Everyone else seems to be on holiday, so I guess I'll look into it (unless
you want to send a patch? :-).)

Could libtoolize just use 'cp -f -p' instead of 'cp -f' when copying the files and leave the timestamps as they are in the original libltdl directory? I admit to not understanding all the details, but that was enough to clear up the problem for me (as one would expect - the installed sources of libltdl should be setup correctly...). Seems much easier than any of the other options.


Brian

--
  Brian Barrett
  Graduate Student, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University
  http://www.osl.iu.edu/~brbarret/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]