[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: link_all_deplibs
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: link_all_deplibs |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:27:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:10:34PM CET:
> * Christoph Wellner wrote on Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:08:28PM CET:
...
> Thanks. Can you do a favor for me: add
> -Xlinker --no-add-needed
> to LDFLAGS on build
Never mind. Debian's binutils does not support that option yet.
Question for everybody: the linker adds a library to DT_NEEDED
which is not mentioned in the link command line. It is found
as DT_NEEDED entry in a dependent library (it does not add to
the DT_RPATH). Does anybody know exactly when ld does that?
Is there a concise document regarding this or does one have to
resort to the source code?
ld.info is definitely not very enlightening on this issue.
Debian with its link_all_deplibs=no will have to work around this
issue.
Regards,
Ralf
- Re: link_all_deplibs, (continued)
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/01/14
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Christoph Wellner, 2005/01/15
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/01/16
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Christoph Wellner, 2005/01/17
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/01/17
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Christoph Wellner, 2005/01/18
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/01/18
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Christoph Wellner, 2005/01/19
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Christoph Wellner, 2005/01/20
- Re: link_all_deplibs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/01/21
- Re: link_all_deplibs,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
Re: link_all_deplibs, Christoph Wellner, 2005/01/17