[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:11:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:55:20AM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> The effect of the original patch was to reduce the maintenance
> hassle of changing libtool after we discover a new option that
> should be passed through, and then have everyone wait for the patch
> to percolate through to a release. With that in mind, it would be a
> shame to have to revert the patches now.
>
> Maybe we could mandate that option arguments to be passed through
> libtool have to be mangled? So we'd accept, say, -Woff=all and
> unmangle it before calling the compiler...
We shouldn't force the users to change their behavior though.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/14
- Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2004/09/14
Re: Recent patch to pass through unrecognized options in CVS HEAD, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/14