[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no serial number?
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: no serial number? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:37:06 +0000 |
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 16:48, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Patrick Welche wrote:
> | libtool.m4 contains:
> |
> | # serial 49 AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> | AC_DEFUN_ONCE([LT_INIT],
> | AU_DEFUN([AC_PROG_LIBTOOL], [LT_INIT])
> | AU_DEFUN([AM_PROG_LIBTOOL], [LT_INIT])
> |
> |>From the above, libtoolize won't include libtool.m4, because it is looking
> | for AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_LIBTOOL])
> |
> | It seems one can either change libtool.m4's serial line to LT_INIT and
> | change libtoolize to look for LT_INIT, or one can change libtoolize to
> | look for A[CU]_DEFUN [macro_name].
> |
> | Thoughts?
>
> Exactly right. I have a half cocked patch to fix this that needs testing
> before I commit...
>
Did this patch get lost in the battle of BT vs. THE PLIERS? :-)
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part