[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in CVS bootstrap with Automake 1.7
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in CVS bootstrap with Automake 1.7 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:25:00 +0000 |
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:49, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to see whether we can hack around this, but to be honest, I
> > don't see any problem with requiring 1.8 for our bootstrap now -- it
> > significantly reduces the size of our tar.gz
>
> I don't see any problem with this requirement either. Perhaps some
> Linux distribution maintainers would disagree. Linux distributions
> should be encouraged to use and provide the latest auto* tools.
>
Theoretically they shouldn't need to worry about our CVS bootstrap, as
they'd be packaging our released tarballs anyway.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part