[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
From: |
Robert Boehne |
Subject: |
[PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:52:25 -0600 |
Ok, here it is. This patch changes AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC
so that it only appends -DPIC to the default "C" tag and the CXX
tag for C++. I would also like to deprecate -DPIC in the 1.5 release
to make it clear we intend to do away with it. I would also like
to ask anyone who does depend on this to let us know when/where/why &
how
so we can add a section to the documentation on how to modify
code to not need -DPIC.
Here is a sample of before & after the patch is applied:
before:
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=C --config | grep pic_flag=
libtool: ignoring unknown tag C
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=GCJ --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
pic_flag=" -fPIC"
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=F77 --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
pic_flag=" -DPIC"
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=CXX --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
after:
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=CXX --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=GCJ --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
pic_flag=" -fPIC"
address@hidden ~/libtool]$ ./libtool --tag=F77 --config | grep pic_flag=
pic_flag=" -fPIC -DPIC"
pic_flag=""
ChangeLog entry:
2003-01-15 Robert Boehne <address@hidden>
* libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC): Don't add -DPIC
for languages other than C and C++.
Simon Richter wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> > I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than
> > C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler
> > in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so
> > important, why doesn't the compiler define it for you?
>
> Current gcc defines __PIC__ and __pic__ if -fPIC or -fpic is used (this
> is defined in the specs file), and actually this is the right way to do
> it, but I fear that people are still using #ifdef PIC because they have
> seen it defined on the command line and are not aware of __PIC__.
>
> What would be needed is a good transition plan. For example, the
> libtoolize command could list the incompatible changes since the last
> version.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Index: libtool.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/libtool.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.290
diff -u -r1.290 libtool.m4
--- libtool.m4 15 Jan 2003 02:55:33 -0000 1.290
+++ libtool.m4 16 Jan 2003 03:47:07 -0000
@@ -4758,7 +4758,7 @@
if test -n "$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)"; then
AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION([if $compiler PIC flag
$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1) works],
_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works, $1),
- [$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)ifelse([$1],[GCJ],[],[ -DPIC])],
[],
+ [$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)ifelse([$1],[],[
-DPIC],[ifelse([$1],[CXX],[ -DPIC],[])])], [],
[case $_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1) in
"" | " "*) ;;
*) _LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)="
$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)" ;;
@@ -4772,7 +4772,7 @@
_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)=
;;
*)
- _LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic,
$1)="$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)ifelse([$1],[GCJ],[],[ -DPIC])"
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic,
$1)="$_LT_AC_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)ifelse([$1],[],[
-DPIC],[ifelse([$1],[CXX],[ -DPIC],[])])"
;;
esac
])
- RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/15
- RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/15
- RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/15
- Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Simon Richter, 2003/01/15
- [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC,
Robert Boehne <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Simon Richter, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Kevin Ryde, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Robert Boehne, 2003/01/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Robert Boehne, 2003/01/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Kevin Ryde, 2003/01/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Robert Boehne, 2003/01/17