[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiple rpath
From: |
libtool |
Subject: |
Re: multiple rpath |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:17:45 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:42:41PM +0000, F J Franklin wrote:
> AFAICT, libtool ignores all but the first -rpath argument.
>
> I want to be able to add -rpath to LDFLAGS in my Makefile.am but automake
> specifies -rpath automatically and my attempt to specify it gets ignored
> (causing problems).
>
> I would like to modify libtool so that it uses the *last* specified rpath
> (and, anyway, isn't this the traditional method of interpreting command
> line options?). Is there any reason why this shouldn't be done?
Why do you want multiple -rpath options? Here's the definition of
-rpath:
`-rpath LIBDIR'
If OUTPUT-FILE is a library, it will eventually be installed in
LIBDIR. If OUTPUT-FILE is a program, add LIBDIR to the run-time
path of the program.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- multiple rpath, F J Franklin, 2001/11/07
- Re: multiple rpath,
libtool <=