[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS
From: |
Tim Mooney |
Subject: |
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:15:35 -0500 (CDT) |
In regard to: Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Rainer Orth...:
>Fortunately, they have fixed this in Patch kit 2 (Patch 260) for Tru64 UNIX
>V5.1. Although the new /sbin/loader is only for V5.1, a pre-release binary
>I had was claimed to work on V5.0 and V5.0A, too, although this is not
>supported.
Thanks for the info. I have Patch Kit #3 installed (including that patch),
and you're right! I just verified this using Robert's test.
>Since the V5.1 loader is said to be a full rewrite, this will never make it
>into V4.0.
That's too bad. 4.x and earlier also have a horrible XPG conformance issue
with restartable signals, and the fix for that (in 5.x) also won't be
backported.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney address@hidden
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, (continued)
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Robert Boehne, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Rainer Orth, 2001/07/16
- Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS,
Tim Mooney <=
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, libtool, 2001/07/16
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Gary V . Vaughan, 2001/07/16
Re: question about AC_LTDL_SYS_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS, Tim Mooney, 2001/07/16