[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mdemo ltdl failure
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: mdemo ltdl failure |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:25:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hi Charles, Bruno,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:34:56AM CEST:
>
> Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
> with identical results.
Thank you for patching and testing, and thanks to Bruno for the fine
review.
> I did not bump the argz.m4 serial again (I'm not sure what the rules are:
> bump on EVERY change, or only on "big" changes?). So, Ralf, please do that
> manually if it is necessary.
It can't hurt, so I did that, and applied (libtool and gnulib).
> + if test "$lt_os_major" -gt 1 \
> + || { test "$lt_os_major" -eq 1 \
> + && { test "$lt_os_minor" -gt 5 \
> + || { test "$lt_os_minor" -eq 5 \
> + && test "$lt_os_micro" -gt 24; }; }; }; then
Bruno asked for this GCS compliant formatting. I have some (very minor)
issue with it: it looks uglier in shell, due to the necessary
backslashes. Also, the GCS specify this for C code only, to be strict.
But I'm not all that strong about it, so I left it in your patch.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, (continued)
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Charles Wilson, 2007/04/19
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Charles Wilson, 2007/04/19
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/04/24
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Charles Wilson, 2007/04/24
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/04/25
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Charles Wilson, 2007/04/25
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/04/25
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/25
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, libtool, 2007/04/25
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure, Charles Wilson, 2007/04/26
- Re: mdemo ltdl failure,
Ralf Wildenhues <=