Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 3

[Aaron E-J]

Words themselves,
Are little more than dry shells,
It is the meaning of a word,
Which is its shell broken open to see the juice within,
What is sweet to some,
To others is bitter,
And this a sole division,
Which is a source for conflict.
-Aaron E-J
However, it is also a source for joy, a source for love, at its root, division in language is necessary for life to exist.  It is the act of communicating that is the translation of a word into meaning.  Computers, if defined as things that compute, by definition cannot be alive.  Then again, definition is a word in and of itself, and thus is subject to those rules as well.

Aaron E-J
http://otherrealm.org
http://theotherrealm.org (Blog)

On 2016-02-02 9:59 AM, Johnny Merrill wrote:

These are the Literacy Objects. They are made for children.

To migrate from nouns to objects we must first class time by design to Identify Object Classes based on Inheritance.

😀 gTime — GalileoTime

/|\ Nature's Creations

/ \ Human Creations

Our language install was Procedural Programming instead of Object Oriented Programming causing a mixing of Object Classes. With Procedural Programming you can violate physics, as our species lives today. It's bad code on top of bad code. Every generation of procedurally programed adult is more dangerous than the last because they are farther from the source.

Now, we, the open source community, can deliver common reserved word dictionaries worldwide based on Computer Science. We can reset humanity back to nature, and preserve child nature, by class language by design.

When I say "nature".... A child can be born in one culture and seamlessly raised in another culture because their physics aware logic, their nature, is intact. Children are like dogs and cats, nature, they transcend culture.

The problem is, One Child Nature is born to adults of 1000's of CULTures. One child nature is born to adults who disregard child nature and grow culture. We were those children. We are those adults.

Just take the Native Prospective. Revive your nature, and lets get to work.

love, johnny

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:24 PM, <libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org> wrote:

Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
        libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        libreplanet-discuss-owner@libreplanet.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: migrate from nouns to objects (Connor Doherty)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:04:44 -0500
From: Connor Doherty <cnnr_dhrty@live.com>
To: "libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org"
        <libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org>, Johnny Merrill
        <ruralhack@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] migrate from nouns to objects
Message-ID: SNT150-W8422C481F3F2D33DE5AC4E9EDF0@phx.gbl"><SNT150-W8422C481F3F2D33DE5AC4E9EDF0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

At that rate, we should all just use lojban.

> From: libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org
> Subject: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 2
> To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:48:11 -0500
>
> Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
>       libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       libreplanet-discuss-owner@libreplanet.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 1 (Johnny Merrill)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:27:24 -0800
> From: Johnny Merrill <ruralhack@gmail.com>
> To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72,
>       Issue 1
> Message-ID:
>       <CAEFPwg5Go-B-em2Y1eMYtPo-ccV=CREHurQtfu8_u5b6qpV96g@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> We need to migrate from nouns, verbs, and conjunctions to objects,
> attributes, and operators.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iewwk1j4I3o
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:18 PM, <libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
> >         libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >         https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         libreplanet-discuss-owner@libreplanet.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 71,   Issue 6 (Charley Quinton)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:18:47 -0600
> > From: Charley Quinton <charleyquinton@gmail.com>
> > To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> > Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 71,
> >         Issue 6
> > Message-ID:
> >         <
> > CAJxLMTiesT4O6v7K6w1NBaZB2WM_80bT67YLGXhTgk5LdVoWKA@mail.gmail.com">CAJxLMTiesT4O6v7K6w1NBaZB2WM_80bT67YLGXhTgk5LdVoWKA@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Are you reading my mind, my document here ->
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MVB1RDkeS4Gh0eRtYhYPXFDK8I2ejcRyXi6ujtJPnH4/
> > or simply listening to common sense, Fabio? I agree whole-heartedly. See my
> > user page at LibrePlanet.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, <
> > libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Send libreplanet-discuss mailing list submissions to
> > >         libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > >
> > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > >         libreplanet-discuss-request@libreplanet.org
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > >         libreplanet-discuss-owner@libreplanet.org
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of libreplanet-discuss digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > >    1. Teaching programming and free software to those who can
> > >       listen (and everybody else, too) (Fabio Pesari)
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:39:19 +0100
> > > From: Fabio Pesari <fabiop@gnu.org>
> > > To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> > > Subject: [libreplanet-discuss] Teaching programming and free software
> > >         to those who can listen (and everybody else, too)
> > > Message-ID: <56A24D27.2040101@gnu.org>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > >
> > > tl;dr: The free software community should teach as many people as it
> > >        can about programming and free software. The best that can
> > >        happen is that those people contribute to free software, and the
> > >        worst is that they become aware of free software and learn how
> > >        computers work, which might encourage them to reject nonfree
> > >        software even if they don't end up becoming developers. Win-win.
> > >
> > > There are many courses nowadays which aim to teach programming
> > > (especially in schools) at zero cost, but those are usually funded by
> > > corporations who develop proprietary software and want to promote their
> > > own agendas and walled gardens, as well as lower the wages of
> > > future programmers (which goes against their purposes, since it will
> > > inevitably encourage independent crowdfunding).
> > >
> > > The free software community should do its best to make sure that when
> > > people are taught about programming, there isn't any bias toward
> > > proprietary technologies, and that free software is taught as an
> > > essential concept (like free speech) rather than something optional
> > > (like "open source"), with an emphasis on copyleft (otherwise, we'd
> > > be doing those companies a favor).
> > >
> > > It would be ideal to teach free software and programming directly in
> > > schools, but we all know that won't happen anytime soon for a number of
> > > reasons, so I thought perhaps we could offer people some
> > > *zero cost courses which ideally, should be recognized as valid
> > > certifications* (can the FSF or FSFE help there, I wonder)?
> > >
> > > Here's some people who might benefit from it, and that should be
> > > especially targeted (since they are snubbed by all of society):
> > >
> > > 1. Poor, unemployed people [Easy]
> > >
> > >    These are sad times. A lot of (especially young) people are
> > >    committing suicide (or crimes, see point 3) due to unemployment (and
> > >    its consequences, like the impossibility to start a family,
> > >    homelessness, mental illness, addiction and debt) and automation is
> > >    only going to reduce the number of available jobs in the future
> > >    (except programmers, until they get replaced by AIs).
> > >
> > >    Even if a Basic Income is implemented globally, those people would
> > >    still have a lot of free time on their hands and depend completely
> > >    on their government, which might hurt their dignity as well as
> > >    require them to be "good citizens" and accept every potential future
> > >    law in order to be eligible for the BI, some of which could force
> > >    them to use proprietary software (since most countries are
> > >    considering to ban encryption without backdoors, even if it's just
> > >    mathematics, and it's hard to enforce such a ban unless proprietary
> > >    software is also enforced; it isn't hard to imagine a world in which
> > >    developing or even using free software requires explicit
> > >    authorization, and only corporations and the government are granted
> > >    it - even if such a regime would last very shortly).
> > >
> > >    Teaching programming to these people can help them find a job in one
> > >    of the few fields that won't be affected by automation anytime soon,
> > >    and contributing to free software can offer them a chance to build
> > >    their portfolios and CVs.
> > >
> > >    If they want to keep contributing to free software after they find a
> > >    job, good for them (and us); if they don't, at least they will know
> > >    about free software, which is more than you can say about most
> > >    people who work in IT nowadays (who are all about "open source",
> > >    which often just means writing the same programs over and over in
> > >    _javascript_ using Sublime Text on Mac OS X and releasing them without
> > >    any licensing info on Github).
> > >
> > > 2. Retired people [Medium]
> > >
> > >    Retired people have a lot of time on their hands and they often
> > >    are treated as if they are useless or unable to keep up with the
> > >    younger generations, but I don't think that's true, and many of them
> > >    are lonely and abandoned by their own families and would greatly
> > >    benefit from the warmth of the free software community, as well as
> > >    the sense of purpose that contributing to free software can offer
> > >    (or maybe, just a nice hobby, or a side job because pensions are
> > >    too low, especially now that many adults have to live with their
> > >    parents due to unemployment, see point 1).
> > >
> > >    The way old people are ignored and put aside in our technological
> > >    world is cold and dehumanizing, and only free software can offer them
> > >    a chance to participate (because, willing or not, even old people
> > >    will be forced to interact with technology at some point).
> > >
> > >    I spent a lot of time with old people in my life and I know they
> > >    like to feel useful (or rather, helpful), just like everybody else.
> > >    I'm Italian and in my country, old women who can't chew their own
> > >    food will spend many hours preparing it for others, even when they
> > >    are close to death, and feel happy and fulfilled when they see
> > >    someone eat and enjoy it, even strangers.
> > >
> > >    I think giving old people a second chance to participate in society
> > >    is great, and that they have a lot of wisdom and perspective to offer
> > >    that most of us don't have (especially when it comes to
> > >    accessibility, UI and UX. If a granny can understand something,
> > >    it means it's done properly).
> > >
> > >    Plus, there are tons of old people who used to work in software
> > >    development, it's just a matter of getting them into free
> > >    software. People in retirement age include Larry Wall, who just
> > >    helped create Perl 6, Ken Thompson & Rob Pike, co-creators of Go,
> > >    Bjarne Stroustrup, who's making C++ better than ever and of course,
> > >    RMS. I'm sure there's someone like them out there, maybe someone
> > >    who's worked as a researcher or a C64 developer for many years and
> > >    who can outcode even the leetest of us, and has never heard of free
> > >    software but would jump on it if given the chance.
> > >
> > > 3. Prisoners [Hard]
> > >
> > >    This can sound controversial - who would use a program
> > >    knowing that it was written by a criminal?
> > >
> > >    Ignoring the fact that authors can legally use a pseudonym, that
> > >    I don't know anything about who wrote the programs I use daily,
> > >    that a lot of people are arrested for nonviolent (often
> > >    drug-related) offences and that some of them committed crimes due to
> > >    hopelessness (see point 1), people have no issue listening to
> > >    popular music or watching Hollywood films or mainstream sports, so
> > >    I don't expect them to react differently to software.
> > >
> > >    Some people who've been arrested are sincerely sorry for what
> > >    they've done, are quietly paying their dues and would like to
> > >    contribute back to society and to be offered a chance to reintegrate
> > >    for when (if) they get out.
> > >    (No need to mention those who are innocent or have been arrested
> > >    under ridiculous charges, like free software developer Bassel
> > >    Khartabil - I'm pretty sure that if he's alive, he'd rather write
> > >    some free code than not. Please never forget about him, it could
> > >    have been anyone who posts here!)
> > >
> > >    Prisoners can already write books and record albums in some
> > >    countries; there's no rational reason a prisoner shouldn't develop
> > >    free software and even without access to the Internet, they still can
> > >    write code that can be reviewed (for hidden messages) and submitted
> > >    by authorities on their behalf, using a pseudonym if necessary.
> > >
> > >    There are plenty of prisoners who can already program and most of
> > >    the others would benefit from learning this trade, as they will
> > >    likely be poor and unemployed when they get out (point 1), and even
> > >    worse, with a criminal record. Why not give them a chance to have a
> > >    better future, so that they are less likely to repeat their mistakes
> > >    when they get out?
> > >
> > >    Even if someone has been given a life sentence (the "hidden death
> > >    penalty"), free software could give them another shot at life,
> > >    something purposeful to look forward to and a chance to share
> > >    something with the outside world, to redeem themselves and leave
> > >    behind some good memories of them.
> > >
> > >    Prison should aim to rehabilitate people, and free software can do
> > >    that by teaching its altruistic values.
> > >
> > > Teaching programming to as many people as possible, in general, can
> > > only be helpful for the purpose of spreading free software. Let's say
> > > you teach programming to 1000 people - even if all of them find a job
> > > developing proprietary software (unlikely), the chance that at least
> > > one of them (but realistically, more) will develop or promote free
> > > software in their spare time and/or as part of their job is pretty high
> > > compared to the chance people who haven't been taught the same have.
> > >
> > > Of course, free software needs more than programmers. Designers and
> > > people who can spread the word (some would call it "marketing") are
> > > actually a bigger necessity right now - as we have plenty of free
> > > replacements for proprietary programs but nobody is using them, like
> > > Tox or GNU/Linux itself - but the idea is that spreading free software
> > > awareness to the largest number of people possible will naturally also
> > > bring in some who have those skills.
> > >
> > > What do you think? Any programmers willing to share their knowledge with
> > > everybody else?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> > > libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> > > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > > End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 71, Issue 6
> > > **************************************************
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > [image: --]
> >
> > Charley Quinton
> > [image: http://]about.me/charley.quinton
> > <http://about.me/charley.quinton>
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> > http://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/attachments/20160201/ac25c2d4/attachment.html
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> > libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
> >
> >
> > End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 1
> > **************************************************
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/attachments/20160201/21b22a13/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
>
>
> End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 2
> **************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/attachments/20160202/a2db5e04/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


End of libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 72, Issue 3
**************************************************