[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Interpretation of US copyright
|
From: |
Aaron Wolf |
|
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Interpretation of US copyright |
|
Date: |
Sun, 31 May 2015 10:59:08 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
Are you asking about the blog author's interpretation of the moral
significance? They portray a deep sense of indignation, interpreting
this as a violation of the author's moral rights and an assault on
Truth, whereas the quote's author seems to have a different
interpretation of the significance of the issue.
Or are you asking whether it's correct that a little quote can be used
without attribution and not be copyright infringement in the U.S.?
On 05/31/2015 10:45 AM, A. Mani wrote:
> Is this interpretation correct?
> http://ipkitten.blogspot.in/2015/05/a-bird-doesnt-sing-because-it-has.html
>
>
> Best
>
> A. Mani
>
>
>
> Prof(Miss) A. Mani
> CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS
> HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in
> Blog: http://logicamani.blogspot.in/
> http://about.me/logicamani
> sip:girlprofessor@ekiga.net
>
--
Aaron Wolf
co-founder, Snowdrift.coop
music teacher, wolftune.com