Re: Coalescing operator

[Paolo Redaelli]

Il 3 luglio 2022 20:33:26 CEST, Raphael Mack <ramack@raphael-mack.de> ha 
scritto:
>Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 10:14 +0200 schrieb Paolo Redaelli:
>> Il 30/06/22 18:41, Hans Zwakenberg ha scritto:
>> > What would happen if neither of the two arguments in your example
>> > is void?  Which of the two would be printed?
>> 
>> None, it would trigger a call to void exception if the first argument
>> is 
>> Void.
>
>I guess you misread the question. It was about both being NON-Void.
>Then the second would be printed.
>
>But clearly illegal would be if the first one w/could be Void ad this
>would always be the target for the "or" call.

Ooops, you're right 😅

("Foo" or "bar").is_equal("bar")

33 or 42 = 42

Using is_default instead of Void works for both expanded and reference types. 
The diff is really small, I'll save it for a later time.


-- 
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.